ThoughtShades FrameWork

ThoughtSculpting:
Essays, Themes, Opinions

PrimaryColors:
Constructs, Practical Ideas, Applications

VersePainting:
Poetry, Impression Writing

WordShaping:
Sermons, Devotions

LifeSketching:
Personal Revelations, Illustrations

Viewpoint: Politics, Contemporary Issues, Editorials

GuestGalleries:

Choice Offerings by Others

Powered by Squarespace

ThoughtShades

Opinions, expressions, essays and devotions. 


Wednesday
Sep192007

Defending Yourself against Telemarketers

telemarketer.jpgThey call during your dinner hour, wake you up in the middle of your Sunday afternoon nap and even in the morning when you are gulping down your coffee and trying to get out the door. Their phony niceties and polite conversation set you up for hard sells. They won’t take no for an answer. Every response you give only leads to another question. How do they get you to cooperate with them? Easy. You have a natural curiosity about who is calling you. You fear missing an important call or an emergency. You have been trained to be cordial to every caller. They know that and they take advantage of it. Sometimes you buy from them just to get them off the phone. The FREE RIDE needs to be OVER for the telemarketers!

Many people just let their answering machines screen all calls. Others depend on caller ID to determine whether or not they will answer a call. The problem with these tactics is that they are not foolproof. There are some calls you need to take, even though you don’t recognize the name or number. If you do, read on.

First, do not kid yourself about the innocence of telemarketers. They have been thoroughly trained to know how to deal with you. They have response sheets in front of them to know how to respond to any answer you give. While you are answering in good faith, they see you as a challenge, not as a nice person to chat with on the phone. They are under so much pressure to meet quotas that they don’t really listen to your protests for rejecting their offer. They are only scrambling to find an effective way to get you to accept. If you naïvely answer the phone thinking that you are going to have a pleasant conversation with an old friend, get ready to be exploited.

Second, do not feel guilty about being evasive, non-committal or even rude (if necessary) to sales callers. After all, if you meet a street salesman hawking his wares, you say, “No, thank you,” and keep walking. If an unwanted door-to-door salesman comes to your house, you don’t feel embarrassed about saying you’re not interested and shutting the door in his face. Why, then, should you feel any differently about telemarketers? They have no special privileges. They have no right to be on your phone. You are under no obligation to treat them with more courtesy than you would a salesman in any other venue. The RULES have CHANGED!

Third, tape a response sheet (like they do) to a place convenient to your phone and read it slowly and deliberately. Answer none of their questions. NONE! (Unless, in the unlikely event that you are truly interested.) Tell them that you do not accept sales calls for any reason. They will say something like, “Are you interested in saving hundreds or thousands of dollars?” Let an awkward pause follow. This is where you need to decide if you need to get firm or if you should stay passive. Your answer? “I do not accept sales calls for any reason.” If you are creative with words, you can say a lot of things, ask them questions, and make them feel that they are truly inconveniencing you. You don’t have to do this, but you can if you want. If you don’t, you can hang up. Yes. You really can hang up. It’s like walking away from a street hawker. It’s like shutting the door in the face of a door-to-door salesman. It’s not wrong. Again, the rules have changed.

Your personal tranquility must be valued and preserved. You have no reason to allow yourself to be victimized or upset by someone who is paid to call you. Either you value their feelings when they don’t value yours, or you take steps to defend yourself against telemarketers.

Tuesday
Sep182007

The Unity Concept

choirphoto1.jpgMaybe I shouldn’t, but when unity platitudes start floating around a group of Christians, a little squeamishness begins to roll around in my borderline nauseous stomach. Often, the well-intentioned proponent subtly denigrates the practice of differentiating between beliefs as small-minded and spiritually immature, even if it is to preserve clear doctrinal truths and scriptural commands. If only we were big enough, so the argument goes, we would value love and unity above and beyond our parochial hang-ups. Some unity enthusiasts have no convictions that they wouldn’t readily sacrifice on the altar of compromise if they thought it would gain them the approval of the masses. Their concessions cheapen true unity.

Real unity is anything but cheap. It costs us our pride, our traditions, and our self-centeredness. We have to let go of individual egos, long-held notions and personal preferences. Nevertheless, we must aspire for unity in the church. We can pay the price without compromising one iota of truth. True unity is worth whatever it takes to get it. Deep down, I think everyone understands this. The problem, however, lies in the substitutes for unity. We are apt to stop our quest at a place that looks a lot like, but lacks the real essence of, true unity. At least five levels of unity emerge from the chaos to name themselves for us. We must press on through the first four to arrive at the fifth.

Coalition . In the first gulf war, President George Bush (forty-one) put together a group of thirty-five nations to liberate Kuwait from Iraq . The odd collection of nations included not just our friends from Canada and the United Kingdom , but also Egypt , Syria and Saudi Arabia . We cooperated with one another for one purpose only, defeating Saddam Hussein. But the church cannot be satisfied with this kind of unity. A coalition only suspends hostilities long enough to get one thing done. After that, it’s back to belligerence.

Consonance . In the music world, sounds which seem “stable” to the ear are said to be in consonance. They are not necessarily breathtaking combinations of tones or notes, but at least they don’t seem to be fighting with each other as they would be if they were dissonant sounds. The most important thing one can say about consonance is that it eliminates tension. That’s good, but the church must be more than a collection of passive individuals who simply prefer to co-exist without conflict.

Unison . Again, from the music world, when everyone in the room sings the exact same note, they are said to be singing in unison. This sometimes helps when learning a new song, or to vary a choir number, but unison gets boring in a hurry. Besides, every voice can’t reach every note. In the church, unity that forces everyone into an identical mold is an unrealistic and unworkable expectation. While we all abide by the same spiritual principles, we all bring something unique to the table.

Harmony . This may seem like the best way to achieve true unity. What can be more pleasing than complementary sounds blended together in beautiful orchestration? Soprano, tenor, alto and bass in harmony with each other do represent a fullness of sound, but they fall short of the unity ideal. Even in harmony, voices can vary in quality to the point that the song fails to please the ears of the audience. Harmony may be a necessary part of unity, but true unity needs something more.

Oneness . When a church achieves oneness, it soars above all the intermediate levels of unity and becomes a force in the community. Oneness means “one for all and all for one.” Oneness means sharing in goals, ideals and principles. Oneness voices no preferences for who does what, who succeeds where or how evenly the glory gets distributed. Oneness says “I win when you win.” Oneness overrides holdouts, dissension, bruised feelings or petty differences in order to succeed. Oneness senses a need to resolve—not tolerate, hang on to, or ignore— all its conflicts for the sake of victory.

The Tower of Babel would have succeeded without divine intervention. “Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do” (Genesis 11:6). On the day of Pentecost, the people were in one mind and one accord just before a mighty outpouring of the Holy Spirit. In his high-priestly prayer, Jesus prayed “that they all may be one.” How many teams have lost games or championships, how many armies have lost battles or wars, how many corporations have suffered humiliating bankruptcy because one or more members refused to be team conscious?

Without exception, every single team member must sacrifice something in order for the whole team to succeed. Unity will not succeed under any other circumstances. It’s not only when you contribute something, but it is also when you sacrifice something, that you eliminate obstacles to victory. Only then can we answer Christ’s prayer for unity.

Tuesday
Sep112007

Tips for Writing Letters and Articles

letter.jpg I have the blessing (or burden) of reading lots of letters and emails sent to me from various people, some official, some free lance. Very few of them cut the mustard, whatever that means. (Google it for me.) What I mean is that they generally fail to persuade me to do anything. It’s like I am supposed to send them a thousand dollars because they learned how to use a word processor to write a letter and ask me for it. Period. I’m sorry, but after fifty gazillion letters like this, the little switch inside my head or heart that operates my emotions sort of slows down and stops working. It takes some kind of dynamite to get it going again.

I begin every letter knowing that the intended reader hates that he or she got it in the first place. The first word, phrase, sentence or paragraph that bores them is the excuse they’ve been looking for to toss it in the garbage can. (Of course, there are those types who believe that they are under a divine mandate to read every single word on a page and ponder it. They are also the types that don’t have any money to send to you anyway, so don’t get too excited.) The sooner I can get a hook in, the more confidence I have that they will read the letter.

People aren’t interested in your history, your trials and tribulations, your unsolicited advice, your personal opinions about subjects that they couldn’t care less about. They don’t want you to beat around the bush. They want you to get in, get out and get going. Just tell them. Don’t tell them what you’re going to tell them, why you’re going to tell them, how you’re going to tell them or how little you’re going to think of them if they don’t let you tell them.

The following brief points may help you to write better letters, especially to pastors, church members or people from whom you would like to get support. I hope one or two of these bits of advice will make a difference in the responses you get.

Letters

  • Inspiring. Give pastors something they can use from their pulpit. Give church leaders something that will help them in witnessing or in their prayer life. Give average readers something that will make them sit up and say “Wow!”
  • Worth reading . Add value to the reader. Make them think that reading your letter is not a waste of time.
  • Upbeat. Give each letter an overall positive tone. Even negative subjects can be cast in a positive light.
  • Consistent terminology . Don’t interchange words that have different meanings. If you appear confused, you will lose your reader for sure.
  • Avoid wordiness . Don’t use ten words if five will do.
  • Motivating. Write in the active voice. Use verbs. (Avoid be, is, are and was if at all possible.)
  • Understanding. Demonstrate that you know the plight of the pastor, the leader, the respondent.
  • Attract attention . Underline, box quotes, use color. Boredom is death!
  • Say it again . Plan on three mailings to get the point across.

Articles in publications (text)

  • Relevant. Your reader will ask, “What does this have to do with me?” as he or she reads the letter. Once they realize that they don’t have to read it, they will drop it quicker than a New York minute. (I am hoping that you haven’t come across that cliché, in which case you think I am a very clever man.)
  • Current. Stale news is a turn-off.
  • Accurate. Is it factual, specific, verifiable? With the internet, fact-checking couldn’t be easier.
  • Motivating. Does it grab the heart? Anything with little or no emotional appeal fails the test. If I don’t care, I won’t read. If I care, I’ll read voraciously.
  • Informative. What little known or unknown facts are presented? “Hmmm, I didn’t know that!”
  • Interesting. Drab or colorful?

Articles (photos/graphics)
  • Compelling. Makes you look.
  • Stylistic. Trendy fonts, reflects current design concepts.
  • Imaginative. Not the same-old same-old.
  • Action-oriented. Unposed, exciting and moving. Post-office or yearbook poses won’t work.

To the true literary gourmet, these offerings hardly exhaust the subject. If you just want to tweak your work, however, maybe this is all the help you need. I shall look forward to getting better letters in the mail!

Monday
Sep102007

Do You Use Sarcasm? Don't! It's Deadly... and the User? He's an Adult Bully!

By Mary Gardner

www.eslteachersboard.com

00leannesarcasm.jpg“Ouch, those words hurt. I know you were joking, but what you said isn’t funny.”

“WHAT are you saying? Would you please be quiet? You are embarrassing me in front of all of these people!!!!”

“Oh my gosh.. I can’t believe she said that to that person. Doesn’t she know that SHE is the one who looks bad?”

Have you ever mumbled these words to yourself after someone used their razor sharp tongue to slice you or someone you know? Have you ever felt your temperature rising and meanwhile you had a smile plastered on your face?? Someone just zinged you and it was couched as a joke, but it really stung like a bee?

These are some of the internal things that are going on in the midst of a person who doesn’t have control over their tongue. They use sarcasm and they think it’s funny. They think that they’re the big shot, because they’re constantly on top. They can get out of any situation without hurting. They can survive any where because no one is going to take advantage of them!

I know. I used to be a user of sarcasm. I used to be the one who would unintentionally hurt people.

I’m not any more. I’ve learned that it was a defense mechanism for the hurt I felt inside. And now, I want others to know, there is HELP for you.. and the other side? IT:’S BETTER!!!

I experienced a person who was throwing zingers every chance she got. If you’d ask her to hand you a pen, she’d make you beg. If you said, “How is your day, she’d say, “it was good until I saw you”. People laugh. They smile. But really, what is happening inside is they are screaming, ‘GET ME AWAY FROM THIS PERSON!!!”

It’s hard to look back at myself and realize that I was a repeat offender. I was the young and cocky one. I was the one making a lot of money so I could shoot down anyone and win. My bank account told me that I was as cool as they come. I was successful on the world’s eyes and nothing I could say or do could hold me back. I knew how to play the “Nice” game. I had clients who knew me as a loving and fun agent, and I knew that I worked hard and could make them happy. What else did I need? Who else did I need? I had money and a close friend or two, and my mom and dad always loved me… so everyone else could just kiss off!

In reality? I was hurting. I knew that I didn’t have the ability to be vulnerable. I knew that I was covering up a lot of sensitivity that was hurting. I didn’t ever MEAN to be mean, or a bully, but I couldn’t seem to help it. Every time I’d get close to someone, I’d end up saying something mean, sarcastic or cocky that would turn them off to me. I hated it, yet I didn’t know how to stop it.

I was an adult bully. And if you use sarcasm? You are too!!!

Let me tell you how it starts. You were bullied yourself. You had to pretend to be bigger and tougher than you really were so you wouldn’t be hurt all the time. Your verbal finesse got good because you were defending yourself. It probably happened to you when you were a kid. You were probably defending yourself from an older sibling who picked on you all of the time or even a parent who thought that teasing was funny. Maybe it was common place in your family to tease one another. Maybe the others enjoyed the back and forth joking, but you? You were a more sensitive person who took it to heart. You had no other way to survive but put up your dukes.. and strike back.

At the world!!!

I keep thinking about that song that my son is learning in preschool, “Hit me with your best shot. Come on and hit me with your best shot.. fire away” It’s a Pat Benetar song and it’s a classic. You can see how the victim of bullying can BECOME the BULLY!!!

How do you get over it? Well, it’s not always easy!! But it is possible!!! Start by STOPPING ANY SORT of SARCASM. You’ll catch yourself over and over, but find an alternative way to express yourself. Put a rubber band around your wrist and snap it every time you are sarcastic, but just STOP DOING IT.

Next, everyone who is around you knows that it is a defense mechanism. We’ve all watched Dr. Phil or Oprah enough to know that you are truly hurting inside. It’s NO SECRET. You are a BLATENT ADVERTISEMENT for what it feels like to be hurting inside. TRUST me… the SECOND you say something sarcastic, people know that you are on the defense. You aren’t fooling ANYONE!!!

Myself included. When I go back to those old habits, which I occasionally do when I’m challenged, I know that the person is just ruffling my feathers and that I can back down and still have my self esteem in tact. It sometimes takes a minute, but I usually get there.

The ULTIMATE thing you can do is to find someone to discuss how you were so hurt as a child. You can go back and relive those things so you can find it in yourself to forgive those people and be able to move on as a healthy person. Yes, THERAPY is a great place to do that. And don’t give me that , “DON”T TELL ME TO GO TO THERAPY CRAP” or say, “that’ s too touchy feely for me”.

I know. I used to say the same thing. But trust me, when you really have courage, you’ll face yourself. Sometimes that is the hardest thing to do. And when you really have courage, you’ll be able to discuss yourself with another person. And in the context of therapy, it’s confidential. You might even shed a tear or two. “OH NO.. HORRORS!!! SHEDDING A TEAR!!! “

Ooooops.. there I go again!!! Sorry.

I just want to tell you, that a healthy man or woman has all sorts of feelings. Good, bad, indifferent. They are all apart of the human psyche. We are supposed to be able to express anger. And you should express anger if you were bullied as a child. And if you don’t address this bad habit that you endured, you’ll possibly pass it on to your family and that will continue the hurt at a deep level.

Words are the best things that you can give a person. They are also the most painful thing that you can ever inflict upon another person if they are filled with venom. It’s hurtful and it’s nasty. And if you inflict horrible, mean jokes on other people and pass them off as funny, then you need help. You need to change. And if you don’t, you’ll hurt and be lonely for a very long time.

I’m happier now as a person. I’m able to laugh and cry and express every emotion that I’m capable of having. I know I’m an extremely sensitive person now, but that is what helps me in sales, and it’s what I use as a coach. I can feel for others and know how they feel. I don’t have an emotional void anymore. I feel free to love and be loved.

So please pass this on to anyone you know who uses sarcasm. I don’t care if it’s the priest or pastor of your church. If they use it, they can get over it. And they need to know, that they are being a BULLY!!!

Life on the other side can be great. But get to work guys.. and let me know what happens! I can’t wait to hear what this blog stirs up. I’m sure it will…

But I’m ready. Give me your best shot! Fire away!!! I can handle it. But the question is…CAN YOU?

Monday
Sep102007

Jesus First, Jesus Last

1962_pontiac_tempest_convertible_silver_frt_qtr.jpgRemember the first time you drove a car? My brother-in-law, Scotty Teets, got me behind the wheel of his Nash-Rambler and coaxed me to drive. I was shaking all over by the time I was through.

Remember the first car you ever owned? I had a gold 1962 Pontiac Tempest convertible. The gear shift was a little lever underneath the dash, and the driver’s side window kept sliding down from the vibration of the car. It was not a real beauty.

Precious memories. You may not remember your first step, but somebody probably does, and it may even be captured on film, video tape or digital camera. Parents often keep albums where they write down baby’s first word, or keep a lock of hair from Junior’s first haircut, or have your first report card tucked away.

First things intrigue us. We just don’t forget our first date, first child, first home, or our first job. In fact, trivia buffs compile litanies of firsts of nearly everything you can think of. How else would we know that Benjamin Franklin was the first head of the United States Post Office, or that the first macaroni factory in the USA was established in 1848 in Brooklyn, New York? Did you know that Andrew Jackson was the first president to ride in a railroad train? The first to use a telephone was James Garfield. Theodore Roosevelt was the first president to ride in an automobile.

One of the most famous quotes from the Civil War Era was from the uneducated Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest when he was asked the secret of his success. He said, “I get there the fustest with the mostest!”

Sometimes, knowing who was first carries extreme importance from a legal standpoint. In ancient families, the privilege of birthright automatically went to the eldest son. The United States Patent Office exists to make sure the first inventor of an object or a process is registered. Controversy still rages over who really invented the first automobile and the first movie camera. Whoever comes in first in a race, wins, even though the second place finish is only a fraction of a second behind. Sports teams vie for first place in the standings. Students compete to be first in the class.

On the other hand, it may be just as important to be last. The last army still intact in the war is the victor. The last words of a dying person are often the most important. The last day on the job for a retiree is far more memorable than the first. The last survivor of a family or a generation gets more acclaim than he or she received throughout life.

If being first means superiority, birthright, and authority, it ought to be easy to see how important it is to proclaim Jesus Christ as the first. If being last means such great importance, then it is supremely significant that Jesus be seen as the last. Can we find these great honors bestowed on Jesus in the scripture? Absolutely! He not only possesses the attributes of deity, he holds the rights of deity. Jesus is the first and Jesus is the last.

In Revelation 1:8, we read, “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.

Then, in Revelation 22:13, He says, “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last.”

Jesus is the First

This may sound strange, but just how first is He?
He was here yesterday. “…yesterday, today and forever.”
He pre-dates Abraham. “Before Abraham was, I am.”
He has been here since the world began.

Revelation 13:8 “And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the lamb slain from the foundation of the world.”

He is before all things.

Colossians 1:15 “Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature: For by him were all things created, that are in heaven,and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him: And he is before all things, and by him all things consist. And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.”

But wait. Didn’t somebody, anybody show up before Him?

In Job 38, God asks Job, “Where were you when I laid the earth’s foundation? Tell me, if you understand. Who marked off its dimensions? Surely you know! Who stretched a measuring line across it? On ~hat were its footings set, or who laid its cornerstone—while the morning stars sang together and all the angels shouted for joy? “Who shut up the sea behind doors when it burst forth from the womb, when I made the clouds its garment and wrapped it in thick darkness, when I fixed limits for it and set its doors and bars in place, when I said, ‘This far you may come and no farther; here is where your proud waves halt’? “Have you ever given orders to the morning, or shown the dawn its place, that it might take the earth by the edges and shake the wicked out of it?”

Although He was first, Jesus did not remain aloof, distant, cold and isolated. Here we have two towering peaks: first and last. Why didn’t Jesus stay where He was? Why didn’t He remain on the lofty heights of being first, preeminent, before all? Jesus came down the mountain and into the valley.

Philippians 2:5, “Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross.”

Jesus came into the valley where you and I live.
Bethlehem, Gethsemane, Calvary, the tomb.
He came to temptation, suffering, persecution, and beating and death.
He came to mockery, insult and humiliation.
He gave up eternity for time.
He gave up a palace for a stable; a throne for a manger; robes of royalty for swaddling clothes; honor for dishonor; a perfect world for a corrupt world.
He came into the valley where you and I lived without hope. He came because the scripture says, “Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death thou art with me…”

But Jesus knew that He was BOTH the first and the last. The angels, the star, the miracles at Bethlehem testified not only that he was first, but also that he was last. For every stripe, there was a healing. For every insult there was a praise. For the stable, there was a mansion. For Calvary, there was a resurrection. For every humiliation, there was an exaltation.

Philippians 2:9 “Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”

Jesus could give up being first because he knew He was going to be last!

Jesus is the Last.

Ephesians 3:20 “Now unto him that is able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we ask or think, according to the power that worketh in us, Unto him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. Amen.”

Hebrews 13:8 “Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.”

Revelation 22:1 “And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb. In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations. And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him: And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads. And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.”

The song says it all:

“For He alone is worthy,
For He alone is worthy,
For He alone is worthy,
Christ the Lord!”

Worship Him and your joy will be complete!

Thursday
Sep062007

My Chief Justice

ussupremect.jpgAs the 2008 Presidential election gathers steam, one of the most critical factors of every campaign lies in the selection of Supreme Court judges.  The presidential term is limited to two terms, or eight years, but the justices of the Supreme Court serve for the rest of their lives, or until they voluntarily retire.  Thus, whoever the new president nominates for the court will have a powerful effect on the legal system and the nature of the laws passed by congress.  This aspect alone makes the election of a president extremely important.

Recently, the contentious confirmation hearings of both the SCOTUS Chief Justice and an associate justice gave America a fresh look at how our government works. Whenever this rare opportunity comes along, it always deepens our understanding of checks and balances and forces us to reevaluate democratic processes that were birthed over two-hundred and twenty years ago. More importantly, it grants awesome insight to Bible-believers into the justice and judgeship of Jesus Christ.

In a nation of 280 million people, only nine hold our destiny in their hands. The executive branch gives orders, the legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch decides how everyone else operates. Virtually every question that could possibly be posed about life and death comes before these justices. For example, in the first few days of new Chief Justice John Roberts’ tenure, the assisted-suicide case, Gonzales v. Oregon, was heard by the high court. In many such cases, the court renders split decisions. That means five judges vote one way and four dissent. Pick a justice from each side and you would have two highly educated, thoroughly vetted, superbly trained legal minds who are diametrically opposed to each other. Who’s right? It’s all academic—-unless it’s YOUR LIFE that happens to be hanging in the balance! Four think you should live; five decide that you die. The five win.

Of course, the cases heard by the Supreme Court normally go beyond deciding any one individual’s fate; usually these jurists take cases whose consequences impact a much broader cross-section of society. Nevertheless, each verdict, regardless of how broad it may be, ends up affecting individuals like you and me. This is precisely why the confirmation process needs to be detailed, grueling and sometimes even ugly. Americans ought not to get despondent at this. No human being should get to decide such monumental cases without going through a proportionately-sized, painful investigation to determine suitability for the job. If we deem preferential treatment bad, selfish interests reprehensible and corrupt judges who deliberately circumvent the law despicable, then only one recourse remains—-we’ve got to know if the person we choose will not just don a black robe, but will actually do the job.

Senators ask tough questions of a prospective judge. Do you tout a liberal or conservative record? Are you pro-life or pro-abortion? Do you believe in capital punishment? What’s your position on civil rights? Will you protect private property? Will you support the president even if he’s wrong? Which of the seven thousand plus appeals to the Supreme Court a year will you hear? These queries spring from skepticism and grave concern. Furthermore, we want nine judges making these decisions, not just one. It gives us a little more assurance that the verdict will be right.

One thing should be clear: We have no security in the individual judge, never mind his or her education, intelligence or experience. We only have security in the law. And therein lies the problem: A human judge represents our only tenuous connection to the law. The law may be perfect but the judge is not. The best we can do, then, is find out whether or not a judge will be fair, will uphold the constitution and holds deep convictions about right and wrong. We need to know that this judge believes that the law cannot evolve away from its roots or be manipulated into serving some sectarian or minority purpose. And often, even after we burrow deeply into the mind and soul of the candidate, we still harbor doubts. We just never know. Historically, we have erred often enough in our selections to make us nervous.

Three fabulous truths give us cause to celebrate the true Chief Justice, the Lord Jesus Christ. First, the law by which we have eternal life is not the work of men, but it came to us by holy men of old as they were moved upon by the Holy Ghost. God’s law is perfect. “Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” Romans 7:12. Moreover, this Word probes the depths of the soul. “For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” Hebrews 4:12. We can have total confidence in the law.

Second, the Lawgiver who authored this perfect law occupies the judgment seat. “God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ.” Romans 2:16. He who knows the hearts of men, he who wears the name “the Way, the Truth and the Life”, he who understands all things and he who cannot lie makes the decision about the destiny of our souls. While we may tremble with the knowledge, it inspires absolute trust toward the one who wields such supreme power. No corruption taints our Judge.

Last, we know the thoughts and intents of our Judge. He looked not for a way to execute us, but a way to save us. Thus, he descended from the judgment seat long enough to climb a hill called Calvary and suffer our penalty before it was imposed upon us. “For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.” John 3:17. Still obligated to his own eternal legal system, he meted out justice and poured out mercy at the same time. Jesus is my Chief Justice!

Wednesday
Sep052007

Language as a Weapon


navajo-boy.jpg“Who is to say that robbing a people of its language is less violent than war?” —Ray Gwinn Smith

 

by Alfonso Valenzuela

In this issue of The Cultural Knowledge Newsletter, I pay tribute to our Native American brothers from the Navajo Nation, which includes parts of Arizona, New Mexico and Utah. They—like millions of brown-skinned “Americans” whose ancestors co-existed in the Southwest long before an invading European contingent stepped foot on this continent—also know about “linguistic prejudice.” Their experience in this country as true “Americans,” has something in common with us mestizos—the direct descendants of the Spanish Conquistadores and Mexican Indians. Other than sharing physiological similarities such as skin color and height, perhaps the most significant feature that sets us apart from individuals who migrated here from Europe, has to do with linguistics.

Our native languages as well as our physical characteristics make us different from the majority population whose linguistic origins came from another continent. In spite of our linguistic differences, we have contributed in many ways to the growth and development of our country—at peace and at war. And, at different time periods in the history of our nation, people who choose to preserve their identity through their cultural values traditions, customs and language, fall out of grace with those who have lost theirs. But, we will talk about that some other time.

During World War II, a former military serviceman fervently sought a way to help the US devise a code to transmit and receive messages by telephone and wire, that the Japanese military could not break. Philip Johnston, who came to northern Arizona on a covered wagon with his missionary parents, firmly believed that using Navajo men who had proficiency in their native tongue and English, could deceive the Japanese. His early formative years living among the Navajo provided him with the best cross-cultural education, by playing games and learning how to speak the language of his friends. He became so proficient in Navajo that in 1901 at age nine, he served as interpreter when he accompanied his father and two elderly Navajo leaders to Washington, D.C. to talk with President Theodore Roosevelt. His interest and concern for fair treatment of the Navajo and the Hopi prompted the young boy’s father to appeal directly to Roosevelt for help. At the time, the US considered the land where the Navajo lived, public domain. As a result of that meeting, Roosevelt agreed to withdraw that area from sale or settlement; several months later, he went further by issuing an executive order designating that land a reservation, known today as the Leupp Extension.

The idea of using Navajo males to serve in the military as Communications Personnel has an interesting background. After Philip Johnston had finished his military service during World War I, he went to college and graduated with a degree in civil engineering. He went to work in Los Angeles as a civil engineer soon after completing his studies. During this time, he gave lectures about the Navajo culture and described his experiences as a young boy. Meanwhile, he kept reading about the US military’s inability to come up with a fail-safe secret code for transmitting and receiving messages by voice and wire during combat. He felt an obligation to his country even though he had already served his tour of duty in World War I. Feeling frustrated and eager to find a solution, he decided to get in touch with the US Marines to describe his proposal to use Navajo young males as communications personnel. He had no doubts that his plan would work and make a difference for our men in combat.

His chance came on February 1942, when he met with Marine Lieutenant Colonel James E. Jones, Area Signal Officer of Amphibious Corps, Pacific Fleet, headed by Major General Clayton B. Vogel. This meeting took place at Camp Elliott, just north of San Diego. Philip Johnston felt confident that the use of Navajo as a code language by the Marine Corps in voice transmission—radio and wire—would work. Moreover, he assured them that no one could break security. He now needed to prove his theory worked by actually showing the Marine Corps commanders how it worked.

With the approval of the top commanders at Camp Elliott, Philip Johnston took four Navajo males from Los Angeles, plus another one stationed in San Diego, to Camp Elliott on February 28, 1942 to put on a demonstration for the Marine Corps. In the test, two Navajos went into a room with six typical messages written in English used during military combat operations. These two men then transmitted the assigned messages in Navajo to the other two Navajos in a different room, who back-translated them into into English. Repeatedly, the Navajos showed that they could take voice or written messages in English, translate them into Navajo, transmit them in Navajo and then send those same messages back in English.

Some very important military officers witnessed the simulated test, including Colonel Wethered Woodward, of the Division of Plans and Policies, the staff agency who would later make the final decision to recruit Navajo men to begin working on the project. With both Major General Vogel and Colonel Woodward acknowledging the positive results, Philip Johnston prepared the necessary papers to submit their recommendations to the Commandant of the US Marine Headquarters in Washington, D.C., in March of 1942.

Initially, Major General Vogel had recommended the Marine Corps recruit two hundred Navajos who would become “Code Talkers.” But, the Marine Commandant limited the number of the first group to 30. Meanwhile, Philip Johnston put in for a waiver that would allow him to enlist in the Marine Corps in spite of his age and previous military service. He got clearance and ended up with the rank of Staff Sergeant, recruiting young Navajos for the Marine Corps and later training them in the code after finishing boot camp at Camp Pendleton. With the approval of the Navajo Tribal Council, the Marine Corps began locating and recruiting young Navajo men at Window Rock, Arizona, the capital of the Navajo Nation, in May of 1942.

The Code Talkers had so much success throughout various campaigns in the Pacific that they became indispensable as communications specialists. According to Kenji Kawana in his beautiful tribute, Warriors: Navajo Code Talkers, “the way the code was set up, even an untrained Navajo who knew the language couldn’t make out what was said. Besides the alphabet words, they learned the 413 code names in a word test.” To give you a better idea of the training involved before assignments to combat areas, these Navajo Code Talkers had no easy task at hand. During their initial training at Camp Pendleton, recruits took 176 hours of instruction in communications procedures and equipment over a period of four weeks. They had a syllabus that covered a variety of subjects such as printing and message writing, the Navajo vocabulary, voice procedure, Navajo message transmission, wire laying, pole climbing and organization of Marine Infantry regiment, among other things.

Because no words in Navajo existed for common military terms used in combat, the Code Talkers resorted to a very simple approach, which reflects their traditional way of seeking harmony with Mother Earth. Instead they came up with an oral code, taking familiar words from their native tongue, such as humming bird to designate a fighter plane, iron fish for a submarine, as well as using clan names for different Marine units. Also, these men had to come up with alternate terms in code for letters frequently repeated in the English language, consequently these letters had three variants that the Code Talkers used accordingly.

To complicate matters even more, all Code Talkers had to memorize both the primary and alternate code terms while the basic material was printed for use in training in the United States. In addition, the Code Talkers could not take the vocabulary lists with them into combat areas to prevent the enemy from getting hold of them and compromising the entire project. They even faced danger from their own fellow countrymen, who mistook them for Japanese soldiers impersonating Marines in combat uniforms! Yet, they performed admirably everywhere they went and received praise from commanders at all levels.

In The Navajo Code Talkers, Doris Paul cites G.R. Lockard, commanding officer of the Special and Services Battalion of the First Amphibious Corps at Camp Goettage, who sent the following message on May 7, 1943: “As general duty Marines, these people are scrupulously clean, neat, and orderly. They quickly learn to adapt themselves to the conditions of the services. They are quiet and uncomplaining and in eight months I have received only one complaint—a just one. In short, Navajos make good Marines, and I should be very proud to command a unit composed entirely of these people.”

Kenji Kawano, who served in World War II in the First Marine Division’s Headquarters and Service Battalion, learned that one of the units in his battalion—the Division Signal Company—had Navajo Code Talkers. “By the end of the war, Code Talkers had been assigned to all six Marine Divisions in the Pacific and to the Marine Raider and Parachute units as well. They took part in every Marine assault, from Guadacanal in 1942 to Okinawa in 1945.”

Until he came to Window Rock, Arizona in July 1971 to do research for the Marine Oral History Program, Kawano knew little about the Navajo culture. Because of his interest in the Navajo Code Talkers, he became official photographer of the Navajo Code Talkers Association. “Window Rock and the Navajo people were an entirely new experience for me, for not only had I no real knowledge of or an association with Native Americans, it was the first time I had ever been in an environment such as that in Arizona. It was an exciting and interesting experience, for I saw that the Navajo are beautiful and proud people who cherished and relished their traditions and customs despite the many years of effort on the American government to direct them into Anglo ways.”

I offer the following testimonials from two Marine Code Talkers: “Throughout the war against the Japanese in the Pacific, we Code Talkers had to brush up on our codes at every opportunity. When the fighting got bad, words would fail us for a second; it was a good thing we [Navajo] have so many sounds in our language.”—William Kien, 4th Marine Division, Marshall Islands, Saipan, Tinian, Iwo Jima.

“When I was inducted into the service, one of the commitments I made was that I was willing to die for my country—the U.S., the Navajo Nation and my family. My [native] language was my weapon.” David E. Patterson, 4th Marine Division, Roi Atoll, Marshall Islands, Kawajalein Atoll.

I could add much more to this interesting, informative and amazing historical episode involving young men who lived in an isolated area, away from the many conveniences that others enjoyed—and took for granted—in populated areas all over the United States. They proved themselves in every way conceivable, proving their worth, intelligence, bravery, loyalty, sacrifice and patience, during a very critical period in our history. I have no doubt that had Philip Johnston not persisted in his belief that the Navajo language could serve as a communications system that no one could decipher, World War II would have had a different outcome.

Finally, let me leave you with a thought, a phrase that I heard on Nova, broadcast by the Public Broadcasting Service, on KUAT-Channel Six, our local educational television channel :

“Language is the mirror of humanity…and only by studying its reflections can we understand its contributions.” (October 5, 1995 Tucson, Arizona)

Written by Alfonso Valenzuela, President, Cross Currents, International, Cross-Cultural Marketing Communications, 295 N. Meyer, #2, Tucson , Arizona 85701 June 1996c Tel.: (520) 882-2855 Fax: (520) 882-2855 . Sources for this article: Philip Johnston and the Navajo Code Talkers, Syble Lagerquist; Warriors: Navajo Code Talkers. Photographs by Kenji Kawano, Foreward by Carl Gorman, Code Talker and Introduction by Benis M. Frank, USMC; The Navajo Code Talkers, Doris A. Paul; Braided Lives: An Anthology of Multicultral American Writings, Minnesota Humanities Commission.


Questions and Comments: AZDBC@aol.com

© 1996-99 Cultural Knowledge, all rights reserved.

 

Note from J. Mark Jordan:  Our recent visit to Lawton, OK to attend the Native American Conference inspired this reprint.  A Navajo church in New Mexico is affiliated with the UPCI and some of their members were at the conference. I have great respect for them and the work they are doing.  You can reach them www.newcomblupc.com.

Tuesday
Sep042007

Azariah’s Compromise

compromise.jpg“Save that the high places were not removed.” 2 Kings 15:4

Multitudes of seductive messages, promises, criticisms and rhetoric jam today’s airwaves and printed pages. Around rich, mahogany tables, corporate high rollers, contract negotiators, political candidates, prosecutors and defense attorneys match words and wits. It’s the compromise business. When it’s time to deal, people usually hammer out a compromise. “Give me what I want and I’ll give you what you want.” Both sides get something, but both sides lose something as well.

Compromises wiggle and worm their way out of dilemmas like, “Should I pay now or pay later? Will the mess be my back yard or yours? Should I go for peace now and worry about the problems tomorrow?” Spiritually, many people engage in similar struggles. “How can I have everything both ways? How can I please God and please the flesh too? How can I do enough right things to make up for the wrong things I want to do?”

King Azariah’s impressive list of achievements opened up a fabulous opportunity to lead Judah into revival. “He made in Jerusalem engines, invented by cunning men, to be on the towers and upon the bulwarks, to shoot arrows and great stones withal. And his name spread far abroad; for he was marvellously helped, till he was strong. But when he was strong, his heart was lifted up to his destruction: for he transgressed against the LORD his God, and went into the temple of the LORD to burn incense upon the altar of incense.” 2 Chronicles 26:15-16. Instead of reviving Israel, this misguided king left the high places, shrines dedicated to the worship of pagan gods, intact. Why? Because large segments of the population worshipped there. It was risky business to destroy their holy places because such action could have fomented rebellion. Azariah considered himself cunning enough to please everybody. He forged compromises between the warring factions of his culture; he thought he could have it all.

The watchwords of today’s popular wisdom remind me of Azariah’s compromise: multiculturalism; choice; cultural blend; mutual respect; tolerance; diversity. These words do not originate out of the Bible. They represent a far cry from the “Thou shalt nots” of scripture. “Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them.” Exodus 20:3-5. Jesus said, “No man can serve two masters…”

You cannot compromise truth. Truth is absolute. If truth could be compromised, it would not be truth. No one can believe opposing doctrines at the same time. God demands more than politeness, respect or even loving affection toward truth. He wants singular devotion to it.

You cannot compromise principle. Painted up, rationalized out or covered over, wrong never morphs into righteousness. Anyone who protects the high places of sin in his life forfeits his relationship with God. “Be sure your sin will find you out.”

You cannot compromise love. “Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.” 1 John 2:15-17.

What happened to Azariah? “And the LORD smote the king, so that he was a leper unto the day of his death, and dwelt in a several house. And Jotham the king’s son was over the house, judging the people of the land.” 2 Kings 15:5. Compromise yields leprosy, not liberty. Little good has been done when one angers God in the process of making himself happy.

Azariah was known by another name: Uzziah. This ingenious king, war hero and popular leader died a leper. His name will forever represent compromise. A contemporary prophet, Isaiah, was overtaken with admiration of this king. But Uzziah’s death did not lead Isaiah to devastation and ruin. The opposite happened. “In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple. Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly. And one cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the LORD of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory”. Isaiah 6:1-6.

You may think you need to compromise with the world, the flesh and the devil to make things work in your life. Actually, compromise keeps you from seeing the full glory of God. Instead, value your integrity. Make a commitment of singular devotion to God. It will set you free.